Would you like to participate in the Resilience Module?
Yes
No
Text missing!
Text missing!
RS0
Would you like to participate in the Resilience Module?
Yes
No
Not scored
Text missing!
RS1
Does the organization have a senior employee responsible for climate risk and other resilience-related issues associated with this entity?
Yes
The most senior employee responsible for resilience is:
The same individual as the senior decision-maker responsible for sustainability (identified in the Management Aspect of the main GRESB Assessment).
A different individual(s) from the senior decision-maker responsible for sustainability.
Provide the details for the most senior of these employees
Name: ____________
Job title: ____________
E-mail: ____________
LinkedIn profile (optional): ____________
Describe the individual‘s resilience-related qualifications (maximum 250 words)
________________________
No
Provide additional context for the answer provided (maximum 250 words)
________________________
3 points
Text missing!
Text Box: The text box is validated, and its validation status is determined based on the requirements of the indicators. Various validation status lead to different scores according to the table below:
| Validation status | Score |
|---|---|
| Full points | 2/2 |
| Partial points | 1/2 |
| No point | 0 |
RS2
Does the organization have a systematic process for communication and review of resilience-related information by the most senior governance body with responsibility for the entity?
Yes
Climate-related transition risks
The process is in routine use across the organization
The process informs the highest level decision maker or decision making body with responsibility for the entity
The process is documented
The process includes (select all that apply)
Written communications
Presentations or briefings
Briefing documents for review by the Board of Directors
Other: ____________
Physical risks
The process is in routine use across the organization
The process informs the highest level decision maker or decision making body with responsibility for the entity
The process is documented
The process includes (select all that apply)
Written communications
Presentations or briefings
Briefing documents for review by the Board of Directors
Other: ____________
Social risks
The process is in routine use across the organization
The process informs the highest level decision maker or decision making body with responsibility for the entity
The process is documented
The process includes (select all that apply)
Written communications
Presentations or briefings
Briefing documents for review by the Board of Directors
Other: ____________
or URL____________
Indicate where in the evidence the relevant information can be found____
No
Provide additional context for the answer provided (maximum 250 words)
________________________
3 points
Text missing!
Evidence: The evidence is manually validated and assigned a multiplier, according to the table below. The evidence must support the validation requirements. If any requirements are not met, the evidence may be partially accepted or not accepted depending on the level of alignment with the requirements.
| Validation status | Score |
|---|---|
| Accepted | 2/2 |
| Partially accepted | 1/2 |
| Not accepted/not provided | 0 |
Evidence: The evidence is validated and assigned a score which is used as a multiplying factor, according to the table below:
| Validation status | Score |
|---|---|
| Accepted | 1 |
| Not accepted/not provided | 0 |
RS3
Does the organization have a systematic process to assess the entity’s exposure to climate-related transition risk?
Yes
The process is in routine use across the organization
The process is documented
The process is based on a science-based target
The process considers scenarios (select all that apply)
Representative Concentration Pathway 2.6
Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5
Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5
Other: ____________
The process evaluates climate-related transition opportunities and risk factors including (select all that apply)
Policy and legal issues (select all that apply)
Increased pricing of GHG emissions, natural gas or electricity
Enhanced environmental-reporting obligations
Increasingly stringent building and energy codes (e.g., EPC requirements)
Other: ____________
Technology issues (select all that apply)
Write-offs and early retirement of inefficient building attributes
Capital investments to replace “brown” or inefficient equipment (e.g., installation of a heat pump)
Other: ____________
Market issues (select all that apply)
Reduced investor demand for assets with low scoring energy labels/ratings and/or green building certifications
Abrupt and/or unexpected shifts in energy costs
Re-pricing of "brown" assets
Reduction in capital availability
Other: ____________
Asset labels and certifications (select all that apply)
Building energy labels/ratings
Building certifications
Other: ____________
Other: ____________
The process evaluates potential outcomes including (select all that apply)
Risk to asset value;
Risk to tenants;
Risk to communities (particularly vulnerable populations);
Risk to continuity of operations;
Risk to individuals working with or for the entity
Other
-
________________________
Results from the risk assessment are available for investors (select all that apply)
At the entity level
At the asset level
For some assets
For all assets
or URL____________
Indicate where in the evidence the relevant information can be found____
No
Provide additional context for the answer provided (maximum 250 words)
________________________
3 points
Text missing!
Evidence: The evidence is manually validated and assigned a multiplier, according to the table below. The evidence must support the validation requirements. If any requirements are not met, the evidence may be partially accepted or not accepted depending on the level of alignment with the requirements.
| Validation status | Score |
|---|---|
| Accepted | 2/2 |
| Partially accepted | 1/2 |
| Not accepted/not provided | 0 |
RS4
Does the organization have a systematic process to assess the entity’s exposure to social risks?
Yes
The process is in routine use across the organization
The process is documented
The process is based on a science-based target
The process considers scenarios
Representative Concentration Pathway 2.6
Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5
Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5
Other: ____________
The process evaluates social factors including (check all that apply)
Physical security
Cybersecurity
Social disruption
Public health
Poverty
Modern slavery
Other: ____________
The process considers outcomes including (check all that apply)
Risk to asset value
Risk to tenants/customers
Risk to communities (particularly vulnerable populations)
Risk to continuity of operations
Risk to individuals working with or for the entity
Other: ____________
Results from the risk assessment are available for investors (select all that apply)
At the entity level
At the asset level
For some assets
For all assets
or URL____________
Indicate where in the evidence the relevant information can be found____
No
Provide additional context for the answer provided (maximum 250 words)
________________________
3 points
Text missing!
Evidence: The evidence is manually validated and assigned a multiplier, according to the table below. The evidence must support the validation requirements. If any requirements are not met, the evidence may be partially accepted or not accepted depending on the level of alignment with the requirements.
| Validation status | Score |
|---|---|
| Accepted | 2/2 |
| Partially accepted | 1/2 |
| Not accepted/not provided | 0 |
RS5
Does the organization have a systematic process to assess the entity’s exposure to physical environmental risks?
Yes
The process is in routine use across the organization
The process is documented
The process is based on a science-based target
The process considers scenarios
Representative Concentration Pathway 2.6
Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5
Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5
Other: ____________
The process evaluates environmental factors including (check all that apply)
Biological
Climatological
Geophysical
Hydrological
Meteorological
Other: ____________
The process considers outcomes including (check all that apply)
Risk to asset value
Risk to tenants/customers
Risk to communities (particularly vulnerable populations)
Risk to continuity of operations
Risk to individuals working with or for the entity
Other: ____________
Results from the risk assessment are available for investors (select all that apply)
At the entity level
At the asset level
For some assets
For all assets
or URL____________
Indicate where in the evidence the relevant information can be found____
No
Provide additional context for the answer provided (maximum 250 words)
________________________
3 points
Text missing!
Evidence: The evidence is manually validated and assigned a multiplier, according to the table below. The evidence must support the validation requirements. If any requirements are not met, the evidence may be partially accepted or not accepted depending on the level of alignment with the requirements.
| Validation status | Score |
|---|---|
| Accepted | 2/2 |
| Partially accepted | 1/2 |
| Not accepted/not provided | 0 |
RS6
Has the organization implemented resilience-related business strategies covering its assets during the last four years?
Yes
Please select asset type related strategies to manage risk and/or create value (select all that apply):
New construction projects
Transition risk and value creation strategies
Energy demand management
Energy efficiency
Energy supply
Energy storage
Other: ____________
Social risk and value creation strategies
Physical security
Cybersecurity
Social disruption
Public health
Poverty
Modern slavery
Other: ____________
Physical risk and value creation strategies
Biological
Climatological
Geophysical
Hydrological
Meteorological
Other: ____________
Standing investments
Transition risk and value creation strategies
Energy demand management
Energy efficiency
Energy supply
Energy storage
Other: ____________
Social risk and value creation strategies
Physical security
Cybersecurity
Social disruption
Public health
Poverty
Modern slavery
Other: ____________
Physical risk and value creation strategies
Biological
Climatological
Geophysical
Hydrological
Meteorological
Other: ____________
New acquisitions
Transition risk and value creation strategies
Energy demand management
Energy efficiency
Energy supply
Energy storage
Other: ____________
Social risk and value creation strategies
Physical security
Cybersecurity
Social disruption
Public health
Poverty
Modern slavery
Other: ____________
Physical risk and value creation strategies
Biological
Climatological
Geophysical
Hydrological
Meteorological
Other: ____________
or URL____________
Indicate where in the evidence the relevant information can be found____
No
Not Applicable
Provide additional context for the answer provided (maximum 250 words)
________________________
3 points
Text missing!
Text Box: The text box is validated, and its validation status is determined based on the requirements of the indicators. Various validation status lead to different scores according to the table below:
| Validation status | Score |
|---|---|
| Full points | 2/2 |
| Partial points | 1/2 |
| No point | 0 |
Evidence: The evidence is manually validated and assigned a multiplier, according to the table below. The evidence must support the validation requirements. If any requirements are not met, the evidence may be partially accepted or not accepted depending on the level of alignment with the requirements.
| Validation status | Score |
|---|---|
| Accepted | 2/2 |
| Partially accepted | 1/2 |
| Not accepted/not provided | 0 |
RS7
Did the entity have specific climate risk and resilience targets or goals during the reporting period?
Yes
Please describe
Transition risk and value creation
Targets or goals: ____________
Social risk and value creation
Targets or goals: ____________
Physical risk and value creation
Targets or goals: ____________
or URL____________
Indicate where in the evidence the relevant information can be found____
No
Not Applicable
Provide additional context for the answer provided (maximum 250 words)
________________________
3 points
Text missing!
Evidence: The evidence is manually validated and assigned a multiplier, according to the table below. The evidence must support the validation requirements. If any requirements are not met, the evidence may be partially accepted or not accepted depending on the level of alignment with the requirements.
| Validation status | Score |
|---|---|
| Accepted | 2/2 |
| Partially accepted | 1/2 |
| Not accepted/not provided | 0 |
RS8
How did the entity measure resilience-related performance and/or outcomes during the last four years?
Yes
Please describe metrics used to track outcomes during the last four years;
See also TCFD Guidance on this
Transition outcomes and performance measures
Describe metrics tracked: ____________
Social risk measurement, select all that apply
Describe metrics tracked: ____________
Physical risk measurement
Describe metrics tracked: ____________
or URL____________
Indicate where in the evidence the relevant information can be found____
No
Not Applicable
Provide additional context for the answer provided (maximum 250 words)
________________________
3 points
Text missing!
Text Box: The text box is validated, and its validation status is determined based on the requirements of the indicators. Various validation status lead to different scores according to the table below:
| Validation status | Score |
|---|---|
| Full points | 2/2 |
| Partial points | 1/2 |
| No point | 0 |
Evidence: The evidence is manually validated and assigned a multiplier, according to the table below. The evidence must support the validation requirements. If any requirements are not met, the evidence may be partially accepted or not accepted depending on the level of alignment with the requirements.
| Validation status | Score |
|---|---|
| Accepted | 2/2 |
| Partially accepted | 1/2 |
| Not accepted/not provided | 0 |
Text missing!